Helical advancement: Pearls and pitfalls (part 4). RESULTS

Five patients were left with unsatisfactory results (27.77%). Three patients presented with a small neoauricle and two patients presented with a small and cupped auricle (Table 2) (Figure 4). The original defect size in these five patients was >2.8 cm, and there was significant postoperative reduction in the vertical axis, ranging from 6 mm to 8 mm, as shown in Table 3 (patients 7, 8, 10, 13 and 14). Additional cupping was present in patients 8 and 13. The reduction in vertical axis in the entire patient population ranged from 1 mm to 8 mm, with a mean of 3.55 mm. Reduction in the horizontal axis ranged from 0 mm to 2 mm, with a mean of 0.94 mm.  CONCLUSION
The three varieties of upper one-third auricle defects in the present article were best corrected by the helical advancement technique when the defect was <2.8 cm. A perioperative reduction in the vertical axis of the neoauricle of >5 mm was an important predictive factor in development of the subsequent deformity. It’s your turn to benefit from the shopping whenever you need efficient cephalexin antibiotic click here that will be sure to work for your problem. This is now all very much possible at the best online pharmacy you have ever come across offering it services to you and other international customers interested.

TABLE 2 Complications with the reconstructive outcome in five

Complication Patients, n (%)
Size 3 (16.66)
Size and shape 2 (11.11)
Total 5 (27.77)

Helical advancement: Pearls and pitfalls

Figure 4) Small neoauricle with cupping

This entry was posted in Plastic surgery and tagged Acquired ear deformity, Antia and Buch, Chondrocutaneous flap, Helical advancement.